お手軽CCDS-O問題集PDFのベスト問題集を使おう！高得点目指すならここ [Q41-Q59]

お手軽CCDS-O問題集PDFのベスト問題集を使おう！高得点目指すならここ

Clinical Documentation Specialist CCDS-O試験と認定テストエンジン

質問 # 41
A patient presents to the clinic with indwelling Foley catheter, symptoms of fatigue, and low back pain with BPH. Labs reveal WBC 20, and the urine culture is positive for E. coli. Prescription antibiotics are ordered for a UTI. Which of the following is the BEST query opportunity?

• A. UTI related to catheter
• B. Etiology of low back pain
• C. Leukocytosis
• D. Etiology of BPH

正解：A

解説：
The strongest CDI query opportunity is clarifying whether the UTI is catheter-associated. The patient has an indwelling Foley catheter, significant leukocytosis (WBC 20), a positive urine culture for E. coli, and is being treated with antibiotics for UTI-these indicators raise a clear question about the etiology of infection and whether it is related to the urinary catheter. In outpatient CDI practice, linking the infection to a device (when clinically supported) improves documentation accuracy, supports correct code assignment, and has important quality and compliance implications because catheter-associated UTIs are captured differently than uncomplicated UTIs. By comparison, querying the "etiology of BPH" is not supported as an immediate gap (BPH is already stated), and the "etiology of low back pain" is less directly tied to the documented treatment focus (UTI management). "Leukocytosis" is a lab finding that is already objectively supported and often represents a symptom/abnormal result rather than the principal clarification needed. Therefore, confirming whether the UTI is related to the Foley catheter is the best, most clinically anchored query.

質問 # 42
Documentation states: "Patient with history of STEMI five weeks ago. Returning to office for follow-up. Problem list includes CAD, hypertension, heart failure, leukemia, malnutrition, and atrial fibrillation, all were relevant to the encounter. CBC and WBC reviewed and referred to oncologist. Follow-up with dietitian to further evaluate nutritional status." Which of the following is the MOST impactful risk adjusted query opportunity?

• A. Type (diastolic, systolic, combined) and acuity of heart failure
• B. Severity of the malnutrition (mild, moderate, severe)
• C. Status (remission, or relapse) and acuity of leukemia
• D. Differentiation of atrial fibrillation (paroxysmal, persistent, permanent)

正解：C

解説：
In outpatient risk adjustment, the highest-impact clarification is often the one that determines whether a condition is currently active (and therefore risk-adjustable) versus historical/resolved. "Leukemia" listed on the problem list, plus active review of CBC/WBC and referral to oncology, strongly suggests ongoing disease evaluation/management. ACDIS outpatient CDI principles emphasize querying to confirm whether the leukemia is active, in relapse, or in remission because that distinction can change code selection from an active malignancy to a history code, and history codes typically do not carry the same risk adjustment impact as an active HCC-bearing diagnosis. While heart failure type/acuity and malnutrition severity are also important for specificity and may affect risk capture, they generally represent refinement of already-established chronic conditions rather than a potential "on/off" determination of a major disease category. Likewise, atrial fibrillation subtype differentiation is clinically useful but usually does not materially change risk adjustment compared with confirming an active hematologic malignancy. Therefore, clarifying leukemia status/acuity is the most impactful risk-adjusted query opportunity.

質問 # 43
Which of the following is covered under the Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS)? (Select all that apply)

• A. Physical therapy treatment
• B. Community mental health centers
• C. Clinical diagnostic lab services
• D. Indian health services

正解：B

解説：
Under Medicare, OPPS is the payment system used primarily for hospital outpatient department (HOPD) services paid under APCs, and it also applies to a limited set of non-hospital entities for specific covered services. Community Mental Health Centers (CMHCs) are included under OPPS for certain outpatient mental health services, most notably partial hospitalization-type services that are paid using OPPS methodology, which is why CMHCs are considered "covered under OPPS" in many outpatient CDI education materials. In contrast, clinical diagnostic laboratory services are generally excluded from OPPS and paid under the Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule (with separate billing and payment rules). Indian Health Services follow different statutory and payment structures and are not paid broadly under OPPS in the same way as HOPDs/CMHC OPPS services. Physical therapy reimbursement is typically governed by therapy-specific rules and fee schedule methodologies rather than being a standard OPPS-covered category in this context. Therefore, among the listed options, CMHCs are the correct OPPS-covered selection.

質問 # 44
Which of the following acronyms is often used in considering reportability of conditions?

• A. RADV
• B. MACRA
• C. MEAT
• D. OPPS

正解：C

解説：
In outpatient CDI, MEAT is a commonly taught framework used to determine whether a condition is sufficiently supported as reportable for a specific encounter. MEAT stands for Monitor, Evaluate, Assess/Address, and Treat. The concept is that diagnoses should not simply be copied forward on a problem list; they should be tied to provider work and clinical relevance during the visit. "Monitor" includes reviewing status, trends, or test results related to the condition. "Evaluate" includes ordering or interpreting studies, considering disease progression, or documenting response to therapy. "Assess/Address" includes documenting stability, exacerbation, or risk and making a plan (education, counseling, referrals). "Treat" includes medications, procedures, or other therapeutic interventions. Using MEAT helps CDI staff educate providers to document the current status and management of chronic diseases, supports accurate coding and risk adjustment, and reduces denials by showing medical necessity. OPPS, MACRA, and RADV are important regulatory/payment terms, but they are not the standard acronym used to assess encounter-level reportability.

質問 # 45
A CDI specialist identifies an opportunity to clarify a patient's BMI. The CDI specialist leaves a query within the medical record for the ancillary support team to address during the patient's visit. Which of the following BEST describes this type of query?

• A. Retrospective
• B. Prospective
• C. Concurrent
• D. Prebill

正解：B

解説：
This scenario describes a query placed before the patient is seen, with the intent that the issue be addressed during the upcoming visit. In outpatient CDI practice, that is the defining feature of a prospective query: it is initiated ahead of the encounter so the provider and/or clinic team can capture needed specificity in real time (here, clarifying BMI-related documentation to support an obesity diagnosis when clinically appropriate). By contrast, a concurrent query is typically issued while the encounter is actively occurring or immediately as documentation is being created and reviewed in near-real time. A retrospective query occurs after the visit is completed, usually during post-encounter review, when opportunities are identified after documentation is finalized. "Prebill" refers to a workflow timing concept tied to billing hold/review before claim submission, not the clinical timing of when the patient will be seen. Because the query is placed in advance specifically to be addressed during the scheduled visit, prospective is the best classification.

質問 # 46
While away on vacation, a patient sustained a compound right femoral shaft fracture requiring ORIF. Upon the patient's return home, the fracture site is determined by the orthopedist to be healing well without any complication. Which of the following diagnoses is MOST appropriate for this office follow-up?

• A. Unspecified fracture of shaft of right femur, initial encounter, open fracture type I or II
• B. Unspecified fracture of shaft of right femur, subsequent encounter for routine healing, closed fracture type I or II
• C. Unspecified fracture of shaft of right femur, subsequent encounter for routine healing, open fracture type I or II
• D. Unspecified fracture of shaft of right femur, initial encounter, closed fracture

正解：C

解説：
For ICD-10-CM injury coding, fracture codes require the correct 7th character to reflect the encounter type and healing status. Because the patient is being seen in the office after surgical treatment (ORIF) and the orthopedist documents the fracture is "healing well without any complication," this is a subsequent encounter for routine healing, not an initial encounter. Therefore, options A and B are incorrect because they use "initial encounter." Next, the injury is described as a compound fracture, which is synonymous with an open fracture. That makes a closed-fracture option inappropriate, eliminating option C. The remaining correct choice is the subsequent-encounter routine-healing option that also identifies the fracture as open. Outpatient CDI principles emphasize ensuring providers document key fracture elements-laterality, anatomic site, open vs closed, and healing status-because these drive compliant code assignment and correct sequencing for follow-up care. While real-world documentation ideally includes Gustilo type specificity, based on the provided choices, the best match is routine healing, subsequent encounter, open fracture.

質問 # 47
PCP notes describe the presence of atrial fibrillation for 10 days. Atenolol, sotalol and rivaroxaban are ordered. Possible ablation is discussed. Identify the type of atrial fibrillation described in this clinical scenario.

• A. Permanent
• B. Paroxysmal
• C. Chronic
• D. Persistent

正解：D

解説：
Atrial fibrillation (AF) type is determined largely by episode duration and whether the rhythm self-terminates. In outpatient CDI education, paroxysmal AF is intermittent and typically terminates spontaneously, commonly within 7 days (often within 48 hours). Persistent AF is sustained and lasts more than 7 days, or requires active intervention (e.g., cardioversion) to restore sinus rhythm. This scenario documents AF "for 10 days," which exceeds the 7-day threshold and therefore best fits persistent AF. The management also aligns with a sustained arrhythmia strategy: rate control (atenolol), rhythm control/antiarrhythmic therapy (sotalol), stroke prevention anticoagulation (rivaroxaban), and discussion of catheter ablation, which is often considered for symptomatic or recurrent/persistent AF. "Chronic" is a nonspecific descriptor and not the preferred current classification term, and permanent AF implies a decision has been made not to pursue rhythm control (accepting AF long-term), which is not supported here because rhythm-control options are being considered.

質問 # 48
Provider documentation states: "Patient is here for follow-up for multiple chronic conditions, including COPD, HTN, DM, and alcohol abuse. She admits to drinking more than she has in the past, starting in the early morning and consumes at least a pint a day. Her BP today is elevated at 165/89. Discussed medications and diet. As she continues to be dependent on alcohol, several treatment options were offered. She stated she would think about it." Which of the following groups of diagnoses is supported by the clinical indicators described?

• A. DM Type 2 with complications, COPD, HTN, alcohol use
• B. DM Type 2 with complications, COPD, alcohol dependence
• C. DM Type 2 without complications, HTN, alcohol abuse
• D. DM Type 2 without complications, HTN, alcohol dependence

正解：D

解説：
The clinical indicators strongly support alcohol dependence, not merely alcohol "use" or "abuse." The patient reports heavy, compulsive intake (early-morning drinking and at least a pint daily), and the provider explicitly documents that she "continues to be dependent on alcohol" and discusses treatment options-this aligns with a dependence-level disorder being addressed. Hypertension is also supported because the BP is elevated (165/89) and the provider documents management activity (medications and diet counseling), meeting encounter relevance/reportability expectations. Diabetes is listed among chronic conditions, but the scenario provides no indicators of complications (no neuropathy, CKD, ulcers, retinopathy, etc.), so the supported choice is DM type 2 without complications rather than "with complications." Although COPD is listed in the "including" statement, no COPD-specific assessment/monitoring/treatment is described in the indicators provided, so the best-supported grouped option focuses on the conditions with clear supporting indicators and management in the note: DM2 without complications, HTN, and alcohol dependence.

質問 # 49
An ACO with 50,000 beneficiaries just completed its first year of a 3-year contract where the final scores were quality 90%; expected costs were $50 million, and actual costs were $52 million. The shared savings rate determined by CMS was 50%. Which of the following is MOST accurate and applies for the ACO?

• A. The ACO will have shared savings or penalty determined at the end of the agreement period.
• B. The ACO will expect to pay back dollars in shared savings.
• C. The ACO will be eligible for shared savings after the second year.
• D. The ACO will expect to receive dollars in shared savings.

正解：B

解説：
In MSSP-style ACO financial reconciliation, performance is evaluated against a benchmark (expected costs). Here, the ACO's actual spending ($52M) exceeds the expected benchmark ($50M) by $2M, meaning the ACO generated shared losses rather than savings. In risk-bearing ACO arrangements, when costs exceed the benchmark and the ACO is in a track that includes downside risk, the organization may owe CMS a portion of those losses. The shared savings/loss rate (50% in this scenario) represents the percentage of the difference from the benchmark that the ACO shares with CMS, assuming applicable thresholds are met. Thus, instead of receiving a shared savings payment, the ACO would be accountable to pay back a share of the excess spending (conceptually 50% of the $2M overage, if all model requirements are satisfied). Option D is not correct because reconciliation is typically performed on a performance-year basis rather than only at the end of the full agreement period, and option C is not how MSSP eligibility works.

質問 # 50
Which of the following contributes to the risk adjustment score under the CMS-HCC model?

• A. Enrollment eligibility status and reported conditions
• B. Health status and previous risk score
• C. Income status and disability status
• D. Cost of care provided and hospital readmissions

正解：A

解説：
Under the CMS-HCC risk adjustment methodology, the RAF is calculated primarily from two categories of inputs: (1) demographic/enrollment eligibility factors and (2) diagnosis codes that map to HCCs based on documented, reportable conditions. Eligibility status matters because Medicare models differentiate beneficiaries by factors such as aged versus disabled status and other enrollment characteristics that affect expected cost. The second major driver is the set of valid, supported ICD-10-CM codes reported for the beneficiary during the data collection period; only certain chronic, clinically significant conditions map to HCCs, and they must be documented as active and applicable to the encounter and coded correctly. In ambulatory CDI, this is why accurate condition capture, specificity, and linkage (e.g., cause/manifestation relationships) are emphasized-because reported conditions directly affect the patient's risk profile and the expected cost benchmark. By contrast, income status is not a standard CMS-HCC input, "previous risk score" is not itself an input variable, and utilization outcomes like cost of care or readmissions are not used to compute RAF (they may be evaluated separately in quality/cost programs).

質問 # 51
An elderly patient with a PMH of CHF, DM type 1, arthritis, and HTN is seen in the clinic for a follow-up appointment after a recent hospitalization. After an evaluation of the patient's current health status, the provider documents the following: "HFrEF: lungs clear, no edema, continue meds. DM: no changes to insulin pump. Arthritis: asymptomatic joint destruction. HTN: BP stable. Continue meds." Which of the following is the clarification opportunity in the above scenario?

• A. The type and severity of heart failure
• B. A link between the DM and arthritis
• C. A link between HTN and heart failure
• D. The insulin status

正解：C

解説：
This encounter documents both hypertension and heart failure management, creating a key outpatient documentation/coding clarification opportunity: whether the heart failure is related to hypertension (hypertensive heart disease with heart failure). Outpatient CDI principles emphasize capturing the true clinical relationships that affect code assignment, risk adjustment, and longitudinal disease management. When HTN and HF coexist, coding may require combination coding and correct sequencing, plus an additional heart failure code to describe the specific HF type. Provider documentation that explicitly links (or explicitly rules out) a causal relationship supports compliant selection of the most accurate diagnosis codes and reduces ambiguity during chart review. The other options are weaker: the provider already documents HFrEF (type), and while added severity detail can help, the scenario's primary clarification "opportunity" is the HTN-HF relationship. DM type 1 inherently involves insulin, so "insulin status" is not the key outpatient clarification point here, and there is no typical direct linkage between DM and arthritis supported by the note.

質問 # 52
An established patient is defined as one who has received professional services from the same or another physician or qualified healthcare professional from the exact same specialty and sub-specialty and belongs to the same group practice, within the past how many years?

• A. 0
• B. 1
• C. 2
• D. 3

正解：B

解説：
For outpatient E/M reporting, "new vs. established patient" status is determined using a lookback period based on prior professional services. An established patient is one who has received face-to-face (or other qualifying professional) services from the same physician or another physician/qualified healthcare professional of the same specialty and subspecialty in the same group practice within the previous three years. This definition is critical for compliant coding because it drives which E/M code family is available (new patient codes vs established patient codes), and it affects relative valuation, documentation expectations, and audit risk. Outpatient CDI education emphasizes helping providers document the medical necessity and complexity of the visit regardless of patient status, but also ensuring correct administrative classification so coders select the correct code set. The three-year window prevents inappropriate use of new patient codes when the patient has an ongoing clinical relationship with the practice/specialty, supporting accurate reimbursement and consistent reporting.

質問 # 53
The primary purpose of clinical documentation improvement (CDI) is to:

• A. Simplify the physician's workflow
• B. Ensure accurate and complete documentation reflecting patient severity and care provided
• C. Reduce coding workload
• D. Increase hospital reimbursement

正解：B

解説：
In outpatient CDI, the foundational aim is documentation integrity-making sure the medical record clearly and consistently tells the clinical story: why the patient is being seen, what conditions are evaluated/managed, the current severity and associated risks, what was done (assessment and treatment), and how this supports medical necessity and accurate code assignment. While reimbursement can be affected, it is an outcome-not the purpose. ACDIS-aligned CDI education emphasizes completeness and specificity so the record reflects true acuity and complexity (e.g., chronic conditions with current status, complicating comorbidities, medication management, and risk/decision-making). This improves downstream quality reporting, risk adjustment accuracy, continuity of care, and compliance because coders must code what is documented, not what is presumed. Strong CDI reduces denials and audit exposure by ensuring diagnoses are clinically supported (MEAT-monitor, evaluate, assess/address, treat) and linked to the encounter's work. In short, CDI exists to ensure the record accurately represents the patient's condition and the care delivered, enabling correct coding, quality measurement, and appropriate payment.

質問 # 54
Which of the following coding guidelines is MOST important for a provider to understand when selecting diagnosis codes for an office visit as opposed to an inpatient stay?

• A. Chronic conditions only have to be coded once a year even if relevant to multiple encounters.
• B. First-listed diagnosis and principal diagnosis are synonymous terms.
• C. Documentation of uncertain diagnoses may not be assigned ICD-10-CM codes.
• D. Documentation is only required for the main reason of the office visit.

正解：C

解説：
A core outpatient guideline difference is how to handle uncertainty in diagnoses. In the inpatient setting, facilities may code diagnoses documented as "probable," "suspected," "likely," or "rule out" at discharge if they meet inpatient reporting rules. In outpatient/office settings, however, uncertain conditions generally are not coded as established diagnoses because the encounter is often focused on evaluation rather than confirmed final diagnoses. Instead, outpatient coding relies on confirmed conditions and/or signs and symptoms when a definitive diagnosis has not been made. This is why outpatient CDI education emphasizes precise provider language: if the clinician is still evaluating, they should document the symptom/abnormal finding and the assessment plan; if the condition is confirmed, they should state it clearly and link it to evaluation/management performed. Options A, B, and D are incorrect because chronic conditions may need to be reported whenever they are assessed/managed, "first-listed" is an outpatient concept distinct from inpatient "principal," and documentation should support all clinically relevant conditions addressed, not only the chief complaint.

質問 # 55
Given the following CMS-HCC categories, which is the correct order (highest to lowest) in the hierarchy?

• A. HCC 35, HCC 37, HCC 36, HCC 38
• B. HCC 35, HCC 36, HCC 37, HCC 38
• C. HCC 38, HCC 37, HCC 36, HCC 35
• D. HCC 38, HCC 36, HCC 37, HCC 35

正解：B

解説：
In the CMS-HCC model, certain disease groupings are arranged in hierarchies so that when multiple related conditions are reported for the same patient, only the most severe (highest-ranked) HCC in that hierarchy is counted for risk adjustment. This prevents "double counting" of clinically related conditions that represent the same underlying burden of illness. The cancer-related HCCs in the 35-38 range are an example of this hierarchical design: if a patient has diagnoses that map to more than one of these HCCs, the model retains the highest-ranked category and suppresses the lower ones. Therefore, the correct hierarchy order is from the most severe category (HCC 35) down sequentially through HCC 36, HCC 37, and HCC 38. From an outpatient CDI perspective, this reinforces why accuracy and specificity matter: documentation should clearly establish the most clinically severe, active, and treated condition so the correct (highest) HCC is captured, rather than relying on nonspecific or less severe descriptors that could under-represent patient complexity.

質問 # 56
During a PCP visit, a provider notes a patient's history of pathological fracture of the thoracic spine related to osteoporosis. Documentation states: "Decreased muscle mass and significant weight loss in the last six months." Which of the following should the CDI specialist query for?

• A. Type of osteoporosis
• B. Presence of malnutrition
• C. Degree of muscle atrophy
• D. Acuity of the pathological fracture

正解：B

解説：
The documentation "decreased muscle mass and significant weight loss in the last six months" raises a strong clinical indicator for a nutrition-related condition (e.g., malnutrition, cachexia, or other clinically significant weight loss) that should be clarified by the provider. In outpatient CDI practice, ACDIS-based guidance emphasizes querying when there are objective or clearly stated indicators suggesting an additional diagnosis that is clinically relevant, affects management, or reflects patient complexity. Malnutrition is particularly important because it can explain functional decline, frailty, and increased risk of falls/fractures, and it often changes the care plan (dietary counseling, nutrition referral, supplementation, labs, monitoring). While "degree of muscle atrophy" and "acuity of the fracture" could matter in other contexts, the note explicitly highlights a systemic decline over six months rather than an acute fracture issue. "Type of osteoporosis" is relevant for specificity, but the new, clinically significant clue here is unintended weight loss with muscle wasting-making malnutrition the most appropriate clarification opportunity.

質問 # 57
Which of the following lab values, when trended for greater than 3 months, indicates an objective measure of chronic kidney damage?

• A. Glucose >100 mg/dL
• B. BUN <12 mg/dL
• C. BNP >1000 pg/mL
• D. GFR <60 ml/min

正解：D

解説：
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined by evidence of kidney damage or reduced kidney function that persists for at least three months. An estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR/GFR) below 60 mL/min sustained over that timeframe is an objective indicator of chronically decreased renal function and supports CKD identification and staging in the outpatient record. This is why outpatient CDI programs frequently use trended eGFR as a clinical indicator to prompt documentation of CKD stage (e.g., stage 3a/3b, stage 4, etc.) when appropriate. BNP >1000 is more aligned with heart failure severity/volume status rather than kidney damage. BUN <12 is within/near normal and does not indicate renal impairment (elevated BUN may be seen with renal dysfunction but is less specific and affected by hydration, diet, GI bleed). Glucose >100 is a screening indicator for impaired fasting glucose/prediabetes but does not, by itself, establish chronic kidney damage. Therefore, sustained GFR <60 is the best objective lab-based measure of chronic kidney damage over time.

質問 # 58
Which of the following conditions is commonly treated with the medication sertraline?

• A. Depression
• B. Schizophrenia
• C. Heart failure
• D. Asthma

正解：A

解説：
Sertraline is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) most commonly used to treat depressive disorders and several anxiety-related conditions. In outpatient chart review, recognizing medication-condition relationships supports accurate problem list maintenance and compliant diagnosis reporting, but the diagnosis must still be clearly documented as assessed/managed at the encounter. Depression is the best match because SSRIs like sertraline are first-line pharmacologic therapy for major depressive disorder and are frequently continued long-term with monitoring for symptom control, side effects, and functional status. Schizophrenia is primarily treated with antipsychotic medications; sertraline may be used only as an adjunct if a comorbid depressive or anxiety disorder is present, so it is not the common primary treatment. Asthma management centers on bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, not SSRIs. Heart failure therapy involves guideline-directed cardiac medications (e.g., beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARNI, diuretics), and sertraline is not a standard heart failure treatment. Outpatient CDI education emphasizes documenting the specific mental health diagnosis, current status (stable/worsening), and treatment plan to support coding.

質問 # 59
......

無料提供中のCCDS-O試験問題集で（2026年最新のPDF問題集）信頼度の高いCCDS-Oテストエンジン：https://www.passtest.jp/ACDIS/CCDS-O-shiken.html

CCDS-OのPDFで最近更新された問題です集試験点数を伸ばそう：https://drive.google.com/open?id=16QFHoIt8ouSkzU-pAD1oWLoJ368QCUco