最新版無料体験を掴み取れ!IAPP CIPP-E問題集PDFは更新されたのは2024年 [Q113-Q128]

Share

最新版無料体験を掴み取れ!IAPP CIPP-E問題集PDFは更新されたのは2024年

最新リリースのCIPP-E問題集はCertified Information Privacy Professional認証済みです


CIPP-E 試験は、欧州のプライバシー枠組み、データ保護原則、GDPR(一般データ保護規則)などの主要なトピックをカバーしています。この認定プログラムは、個人がプライバシー法や規制の複雑で常に変化する風景を航海するために必要なスキルと知識を提供します。CIPP-E 試験は、個人のキャリアにおいて競争力のある優位性を提供するだけでなく、最高水準のプライバシーとデータ保護の維持にコミットしていることを証明します。

 

質問 # 113
Which GDPR principle would a Spanish employer most likely depend upon to annually send the personal data of its employees to the national tax authority?

  • A. The consent of the employees.
  • B. The legitimate interest of the public administration.
  • C. The protection of the vital interest of the employees.
  • D. The legal obligation of the employer.

正解:D

解説:
Reference https://www.huntonprivacyblog.com/2020/03/25/spanish-dpa-publishes-report-on-data-processing- activities-in-relation-to-covid-19/


質問 # 114
To which of the following parties does the territorial scope of the GDPR NOT apply?

  • A. All member countries party to the Treaty of Lisbon.
  • B. All member countries of the European Union.
  • C. All member countries party to the Paris Agreement.
  • D. All member countries of the European Economic Area.

正解:C

解説:
The territorial scope of the GDPR is determined by Article 3 of the Regulation, which sets out two main criteria for applying the GDPR to the processing of personal data: the establishment criterion and the targeting criterion. The establishment criterion applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the EU, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the EU or not. The targeting criterion applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the EU by a controller or processor not established in the EU, where the processing activities are related to the offering of goods or services to such data subjects in the EU or the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the EU. In addition, the GDPR applies to the processing of personal data by a controller not established in the EU, but in a place where Member State law applies by virtue of public international law.
Therefore, the territorial scope of the GDPR does not depend on the membership of a country to a particular international agreement or organisation, but on the location and activities of the controller or processor and the data subjects involved in the processing. The Paris Agreement is an international treaty on climate change that aims to limit global warming and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It does not have any direct or indirect relevance to the GDPR or the protection of personal data. Hence, being a party to the Paris Agreement does not affect the applicability of the GDPR to a country or a controller or processor established in that country.
The other options are incorrect because they are either directly or indirectly related to the GDPR or the protection of personal data. The European Economic Area (EEA) consists of all EU member states plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. The EEA Agreement allows these three countries to participate in the EU's internal market and to adopt most of the EU legislation, including the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EEA countries as if they were EU member states. The Treaty of Lisbon is an international agreement that amends the two treaties which form the constitutional basis of the EU. The Treaty of Lisbon introduces several changes to the EU's institutional structure, decision-making process, and policy areas, including the recognition of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU as legally binding. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU includes the right to the protection of personal data as a fundamental right, and provides the legal basis for the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EU member states that are parties to the Treaty of Lisbon. The European Union (EU) is a political and economic union of 27 member states that are located primarily in Europe. The EU has developed an internal single market through a standardised system of laws that apply in all member states, including the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR applies to all EU member states by virtue of their membership to the EU. Reference: Art. 3 GDPR - Territorial scope, Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3) - version adopted after public consultation, Paris Agreement - Wikipedia, European Economic Area - Wikipedia, Treaty of Lisbon - Wikipedia, European Union - Wikipedia


質問 # 115
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
ProStorage is a multinational cloud storage provider headquartered in the Netherlands. Its CEO. Ruth Brown, has developed a two-pronged strategy for growth: 1) expand ProStorage s global customer base and 2) increase ProStorage's sales force by efficiently onboarding effective teams. Enacting this strategy has recently been complicated by Ruth's health condition, which has limited her working hours, as well as her ability to travel to meet potential customers. ProStorage's Human Resources department and Ruth's Chief of Staff now work together to manage her schedule and ensure that she is able to make all her medical appointments The latter has become especially crucial after Ruth's last trip to India, where she suffered a medical emergency and was hospitalized m New Delhi Unable to reach Ruths family, the hospital reached out to ProStorage and was able to connect with her Chief of Staff, who in coordination with Mary, the head of HR. provided information to the doctors based on accommodate on requests Ruth made when she started a: ProStorage In support of Ruth's strategic goals of hiring more sales representatives, the Human Resources team is focused on improving its processes to ensure that new employees are sourced, interviewed, hired, and onboarded efficiently. To help with this, Mary identified two vendors, HRYourWay, a German based company, and InstaHR, an Australian based company. She decided to have both vendors go through ProStorage's vendor risk review process so she can work with Ruth to make the final decision. As part of the review process, Jackie, who is responsible for maintaining ProStorage's privacy program (including maintaining controller BCRs and conducting vendor risk assessments), reviewed both vendors but completed a transfer impact assessment only for InstaHR. After her review of both boasted a more established privacy program and provided third-party attestations, whereas HRYourWay was a small vendor with minimal data protection operations.
Thus, she recommended InstaHR.
ProStorage's marketing team also worked to meet the strategic goals of the company by focusing on industries where it needed to grow its market share. To help with this, the team selected as a partner UpFinance, a US based company with deep connections to financial industry customers. During ProStorage's diligence process, Jackie from the privacy team noted in the transfer impact assessment that UpFinance implements several data protection measures including end-to-end encryption, with encryption keys held by the customer.
Notably, UpFinance has not received any government requests in its 7 years of business. Still, Jackie recommended that the contract require UpFinance to notify ProStorage if it receives a government request for personal data UpFinance processes on its behalf prior to disclosing such data.
What transfer mechanism did ProStorage most likely rely on to transfer Ruth's medical information to the hospital?

  • A. Performance of a contract with Ruth.
  • B. Protecting against legal liability from Ruth.
  • C. Protecting the vital interest of Ruth.
  • D. Ruth's implied consent.

正解:C

解説:
According to the GDPR, one of the legal bases for transferring personal data to a third country or an international organization is when the transfer is necessary for the protection of the vital interests of the data subject or of another person, where the data subject is physically or legally incapable of giving consent (Article 49(1)). This exception applies only in very limited and exceptional situations, such as life-threatening medical emergencies. In this scenario, ProStorage most likely relied on this legal basis to transfer Ruth's medical information to the hospital in India, where she suffered a medical emergency and was hospitalized. Ruth was presumably unable to give her consent due to her health condition, and the transfer of her medical information was necessary to protect her vital interests, such as her life or health. Therefore, this transfer mechanism was more appropriate than the other options, which either require consent or are not relevant to the situation.


質問 # 116
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Javier is a member of the fitness club EVERFIT. This company has branches in many EU member states, but for the purposes of the GDPR maintains its primary establishment in France. Javier lives in Newry, Northern Ireland (part of the U.K.), and commutes across the border to work in Dundalk, Ireland. Two years ago while on a business trip, Javier was photographed while working out at a branch of EVERFIT in Frankfurt, Germany. At the time, Javier gave his consent to being included in the photograph, since he was told that it would be used for promotional purposes only. Since then, the photograph has been used in the club's U.K. brochures, and it features in the landing page of its U.K. website. However, the fitness club has recently fallen into disrepute due to widespread mistreatment of members at various branches of the club in several EU member states. As a result, Javier no longer feels comfortable with his photograph being publicly associated with the fitness club.
After numerous failed attempts to book an appointment with the manager of the local branch to discuss this matter, Javier sends a letter to EVETFIT requesting that his image be removed from the website and all promotional materials. Months pass and Javier, having received no acknowledgment of his request, becomes very anxious about this matter. After repeatedly failing to contact EVETFIT through alternate channels, he decides to take action against the company.
Javier contacts the U.K. Information Commissioner's Office ('ICO' - the U.K.'s supervisory authority) to lodge a complaint about this matter. The ICO, pursuant to Article 56 (3) of the GDPR, informs the CNIL (i.e. the supervisory authority of EVERFIT's main establishment) about this matter. Despite the fact that EVERFIT has an establishment in the U.K., the CNIL decides to handle the case in accordance with Article 60 of the GDPR.
The CNIL liaises with the ICO, as relevant under the cooperation procedure. In light of issues amongst the supervisory authorities to reach a decision, the European Data Protection Board becomes involved and, pursuant to the consistency mechanism, issues a binding decision.
Additionally, Javier sues EVERFIT for the damages caused as a result of its failure to honor his request to have his photograph removed from the brochure and website.
Assuming that multiple EVETFIT branches across several EU countries are acting as separate data controllers, and that each of those branches were responsible for mishandling Javier's request, how may Javier proceed in order to seek compensation?

  • A. He will be able to apply to the European Data Protection Board in order to determine which particular EVETFIT branch is liable for damages, based on the decision that was made by the board.
  • B. He will have to sue the EVETFIT's head office in France, where EVETFIT has its main establishment.
  • C. He will have to sue each EVETFIT branch so that each branch provides proportionate compensation commensurate with its contribution to the damage or distress suffered by Javier.
  • D. He will be able to sue any one of the relevant EVETFIT branches, as each one may be held liable for the entire damage.

正解:B


質問 # 117
Which of the following is NOT a role of works councils?

  • A. Determining the monetary fines to be levied against employers for data breach violations of employee data.
  • B. Determining whether employees' personal data can be processed or not.
  • C. Determining what changes will affect employee working conditions.
  • D. Determining whether to approve or reject certain decisions of the employer that affect employees.

正解:A

解説:
Works councils are employee representative bodies that exist in some European countries, such as Germany, France, Spain and Italy. They have various roles and powers depending on the national laws and collective agreements, but generally they aim to protect and promote the interests of the employees in relation to the employer. Some of the common roles of works councils are:
Determining whether to approve or reject certain decisions of the employer that affect employees, such as transfers, dismissals, redundancies, working hours, health and safety, etc.
Determining whether employees' personal data can be processed or not, based on the principle of co-determination, which means that the employer needs the consent of the works council for any data processing that involves employee monitoring, evaluation or control.
Determining what changes will affect employee working conditions, such as wages, benefits, training, social facilities, etc.
However, works councils do not have the role of determining the monetary fines to be levied against employers for data breach violations of employee data. This is the role of the data protection authorities, which are independent public bodies that supervise, through investigative and corrective powers, the application of the data protection law. Works councils may cooperate with the data protection authorities or file complaints on behalf of the employees, but they do not have the authority to impose sanctions on the employers. Reference: Free CIPP/E Study Guide, page 27; CIPP/E Certification, page 13.


質問 # 118
The GDPR specifies fines that may be levied against data controllers for certain infringements. Which of the following infringements would be subject to the less severe administrative fine of up to 10 million euros (or in the case of an undertaking, up to 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year)?

  • A. Failure to provide the means for a data subject to rectify inaccuracies in personal data.
  • B. Failure to demonstrate that consent was given by the data subject to the processing of their personal data where it is used as the basis for processing.
  • C. Failure to process personal information in a manner compatible with its original purpose.
  • D. Failure to implement technical and organizational measures to ensure data protection is enshrined by design and default.

正解:D

解説:
According to Article 83 of the GDPR, the less severe administrative fines of up to 10 million euros or 2% of the annual worldwide turnover apply to infringements of the articles governing controllers and processors, certification bodies, and monitoring bodies. These include Articles 8, 11, 25-39, 42, and 43. Among the answer choices, only option B falls under this category, as Article 25 requires controllers to implement data protection by design and by default. Option A is related to Article 7, which governs the conditions for consent. Option C is related to Article 5, which sets out the principles for processing personal data. Option D is related to Article 16, which grants the right to rectification to data subjects. These articles are subject to the more severe administrative fines of up to 20 million euros or 4% of the annual worldwide turnover. Reference:
GDPR Article 83
GDPR Article 25
GDPR Article 7
GDPR Article 5
GDPR Article 16


質問 # 119
Company X has entrusted the processing of their payroll data to Provider Y. Provider Y stores this encrypted data on its server. The IT department of Provider Y finds out that someone managed to hack into the system and take a copy of the data from its server. In this scenario, whom does Provider Y have the obligation to notify?

  • A. Company X
  • B. The supervisory authority
  • C. The public
  • D. Law enforcement

正解:D


質問 # 120
Bioface is a company based in the United States. It has no servers, personnel or assets in the European Union. By collecting photographs from social media and other web-based services, such as newspapers and blogs, it uses machine learning to develop a facial recognition algorithm. The algorithm identifies individuals in photographs who are not in its data set based the algorithm and its existing dat a. The service collects photographs of data subjects in the European Union and will identify them if presented with their photographs. Bioface offers its service to government agencies and companies in the United States and Canada, but not to those in the European Union. Bioface does not offer the service to individuals.
Why is Bioface subject to the territorial scope of the General Data Protection Regulation?

  • A. It collects data from European Union websites, which constitutes an establishment in the European Union.
  • B. It offers services in the European Union by identifying data subjects in the European Union.
  • C. It monitors the behavior of data subjects in the European Union.
  • D. It collects data from subjects and uses it for automated processing.

正解:A


質問 # 121
According to Article 14 of the GDPR, how long does a controller have to provide a data subject with necessary privacy information, if that subject's personal data has been obtained from other sources?

  • A. Within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but no later than eight weeks.
  • B. As soon as possible after the first communication with the data subject.
  • C. As soon as possible after obtaining the personal data.
  • D. Within a reasonable period after obtaining the personal data, but no later than one month.

正解:D

解説:
Reference https://dataprivacymanager.net/gdpr-exemptions-from-the-obligation-to-provide-information-to-the- individual-data-subject/


質問 # 122
Article 29 Working Party has emphasized that the GDPR forbids "forum shopping", which occurs when companies do what?

  • A. Designate their main establishment in member state with the most flexible practices.
  • B. Select third-party processors on the basis of cost rather than quality of privacy protection.
  • C. File appeals of infringement judgments with more than one EU institution simultaneously.
  • D. Choose the data protection officer that is most sympathetic to their business concerns.

正解:A

解説:
Reference https://gdprinformer.com/gdpr-articles/forum-shopping-illegal-gdpr


質問 # 123
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Anna and Frank both work at Granchester University. Anna is a lawyer responsible for data protection, while Frank is a lecturer in the engineering department. The University maintains a number of types of records:
Student records, including names, student numbers, home addresses, pre-university information, university attendance and performance records, details of special educational needs and financial information.
Staff records, including autobiographical materials (such as curricula, professional contact files, student evaluations and other relevant teaching files).
Alumni records, including birthplaces, years of birth, dates of matriculation and conferrals of degrees. These records are available to former students after registering through Granchester's Alumni portal. Department for Education records, showing how certain demographic groups (such as first-generation students) could be expected, on average, to progress. These records do not contain names or identification numbers.
Under their security policy, the University encrypts all of its personal data records in transit and at rest.
In order to improve his teaching, Frank wants to investigate how his engineering students perform in relational to Department for Education expectations. He has attended one of Anna's data protection training courses and knows that he should use no more personal data than necessary to accomplish his goal. He creates a program that will only export some student data: previous schools attended, grades originally obtained, grades currently obtained and first time university attended. He wants to keep the records at the individual student level. Mindful of Anna's training, Frank runs the student numbers through an algorithm to transform them into different reference numbers. He uses the same algorithm on each occasion so that he can update each record over time.
One of Anna's tasks is to complete the record of processing activities, as required by the GDPR.
After receiving her email reminder, as required by the GDPR. After receiving her email reminder, Frank informs Anna about his performance database.
Ann explains to Frank that, as well as minimizing personal data, the University has to check that this new use of existing data is permissible. She also suspects that, under the GDPR, a risk analysis may have to be carried out before the data processing can take place. Anna arranges to discuss this further with Frank after she has done some additional research.
Frank wants to be able to work on his analysis in his spare time, so he transfers it to his home laptop (which is not encrypted). Unfortunately, when Frank takes the laptop into the University he loses it on the train. Frank has to see Anna that day to discuss compatible processing. He knows that he needs to report security incidents, so he decides to tell Anna about his lost laptop at the same time.
Anna will find that a risk analysis is NOT necessary in this situation as long as?

  • A. The algorithms that Frank uses for the processing are technologically sound
  • B. The processing will not negatively affect the rights of the data subjects
  • C. The data subjects are no longer current students of Frank's
  • D. The data subjects gave their unambiguous consent for the original processing

正解:D


質問 # 124
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency are U.S.-based multinational companies. They use an internet-based common platform for collecting and sharing their customer data with each other, in order to integrate their marketing efforts. Additionally, they agree on the data to be stored, how reservations will be booked and confirmed, and who has access to the stored data.
Mike, an EU resident, has booked travel itineraries in the past through XYZ Travel Agency to stay at ABC Hotel Chain's locations. XYZ Travel Agency offers a rewards program that allows customers to sign up to accumulate points that can later be redeemed for free travel. Mike has signed the agreement to be a rewards program member.
Now Mike wants to know what personal information the company holds about him. He sends an email requesting access to his data, in order to exercise what he believes are his data subject rights.
In which of the following situations would ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency NOT have to honor Mike's data access request?

  • A. The request is to obtain access and information about the purpose of processing his personal data.
  • B. The request is to obtain access and erasure of his personal data while keeping his rewards membership.
  • C. The request is to obtain access and the categories of recipients who have received his personal data to process his rewards membership.
  • D. The request is to obtain access and correct inaccurate personal data in his profile.

正解:B

解説:
According to the GDPR, the data subject has the right to obtain from the controller confirmation as to whether or not personal data concerning him or her are being processed, and, where that is the case, access to the personal data and the following information: (a) the purposes of the processing; (b) the categories of personal data concerned; the recipients or categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, in particular recipients in third countries or international organisations; (d) where possible, the envisaged period for which the personal data will be stored, or, if not possible, the criteria used to determine that period; (e) the existence of the right to request from the controller rectification or erasure of personal data or restriction of processing of personal data concerning the data subject or to object to such processing; (f) the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority; (g) where the personal data are not collected from the data subject, any available information as to their source; (h) the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, referred to in Article 22(1) and (4) and, at least in those cases, meaningful information about the logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject1. The data subject also has the right to obtain from the controller without undue delay the rectification of inaccurate personal data concerning him or her2. Therefore, options A, B and D are valid data access requests that ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency have to honor, as they fall within the scope of the right of access and rectification. However, option C is not a valid data access request, as it involves the right to erasure, which is a separate right from the right of access. The right to erasure, also known as the right to be forgotten, entitles the data subject to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay and the controller shall have the obligation to erase personal data without undue delay where one of the following grounds applies: (a) the personal data are no longer necessary in relation to the purposes for which they were collected or otherwise processed; (b) the data subject withdraws consent on which the processing is based according to point (a) of Article 6(1), or point (a) of Article 9(2), and where there is no other legal ground for the processing; the data subject objects to the processing pursuant to Article 21(1) and there are no overriding legitimate grounds for the processing, or the data subject objects to the processing pursuant to Article 21(2); (d) the personal data have been unlawfully processed; (e) the personal data have to be erased for compliance with a legal obligation in Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject; (f) the personal data have been collected in relation to the offer of information society services referred to in Article 8(1)3. However, the right to erasure is not absolute and does not apply where processing is necessary: (a) for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information; (b) for compliance with a legal obligation which requires processing by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject or for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller; for reasons of public interest in the area of public health in accordance with points (h) and (i) of Article 9(2) as well as Article 9(3); (d) for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes in accordance with Article 89(1) in so far as the right referred to in paragraph 1 is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing; or (e) for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims4. In this scenario, Mike's request to obtain access and erasure of his personal data while keeping his rewards membership is not a valid data access request, as it contradicts the right to erasure. If Mike wants to exercise his right to erasure, he has to withdraw his consent for the processing of his personal data by ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency, which means that he cannot keep his rewards membership, as it is based on the processing of his personal data. Moreover, ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency may have other legal grounds for retaining his personal data, such as compliance with a legal obligation or the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims. Therefore, option C is the correct answer, as it is the only situation where ABC Hotel Chain and XYZ Travel Agency do not have to honor Mike's data access request. Reference: 1: Article 15 of the GDPR; 2: Article 16 of the GDPR; 3: Article 17(1) of the GDPR; 4: Article 17(3) of the GDPR; Free CIPP/E Study Guide, pages 33-35.


質問 # 125
A data controller appoints a data protection officer. Which of the following conditions would NOT result in an infringement of Articles 37 to 39 of the GDPR?

  • A. If the data protection officer also manages the marketing budget.
  • B. If the data protection officer lacks ISO 27001 auditor certification.
  • C. If the data protection officer is provided by the data processor.
  • D. If the data protection officer receives instructions from the data controller.

正解:B

解説:
Reference https://www.itgovernance.eu/fr-lu/data-protection-officer-dpo-under-the-gdpr-lu


質問 # 126
SCENARIO
Please use the following to answer the next question:
Anna and Frank both work at Granchester University. Anna is a lawyer responsible for data protection, while Frank is a lecturer in the engineering department. The University maintains a number of types of records:
* Student records, including names, student numbers, home addresses, pre-university information, university attendance and performance records, details of special educational needs and financial information.
* Staff records, including autobiographical materials (such as curricula, professional contact files, student evaluations and other relevant teaching files).
* Alumni records, including birthplaces, years of birth, dates of matriculation and conferrals of degrees.
These records are available to former students after registering through Granchester's Alumni portal.
* Department for Education records, showing how certain demographic groups (such as first-generation students) could be expected, on average, to progress. These records do not contain names or identification numbers.
* Under their security policy, the University encrypts all of its personal data records in transit and at rest.
In order to improve his teaching, Frank wants to investigate how his engineering students perform in relational to Department for Education expectations. He has attended one of Anna's data protection training courses and knows that he should use no more personal data than necessary to accomplish his goal. He creates a program that will only export some student data: previous schools attended, grades originally obtained, grades currently obtained and first time university attended. He wants to keep the records at the individual student level. Mindful of Anna's training, Frank runs the student numbers through an algorithm to transform them into different reference numbers. He uses the same algorithm on each occasion so that he can update each record over time.
One of Anna's tasks is to complete the record of processing activities, as required by the GDPR. After receiving her email reminder, as required by the GDPR. After receiving her email reminder, Frank informs Anna about his performance database.
Ann explains to Frank that, as well as minimizing personal data, the University has to check that this new use of existing data is permissible. She also suspects that, under the GDPR, a risk analysis may have to be carried out before the data processing can take place. Anna arranges to discuss this further with Frank after she has done some additional research.
Frank wants to be able to work on his analysis in his spare time, so he transfers it to his home laptop (which is not encrypted). Unfortunately, when Frank takes the laptop into the University he loses it on the train. Frank has to see Anna that day to discuss compatible processing. He knows that he needs to report security incidents, so he decides to tell Anna about his lost laptop at the same time.
Anna will find that a risk analysis is NOT necessary in this situation as long as?

  • A. The algorithms that Frank uses for the processing are technologically sound
  • B. The processing will not negatively affect the rights of the data subjects
  • C. The data subjects are no longer current students of Frank's
  • D. The data subjects gave their unambiguous consent for the original processing

正解:D


質問 # 127
An organization receives a request multiple times from a data subject seeking to exercise his rights with respect to his own personal dat a. Under what condition can the organization charge the data subject a fee for processing the request?

  • A. Only where the organization can show that it is reasonable to do so because more than one request was made.
  • B. Only if the organization can demonstrate that the request is clearly excessive or misguided.
  • C. Only to the extent this is allowed under the restrictions on data subjects' rights introduced under Art 23 of GDPR.
  • D. Only where the administrative costs of taking the action requested exceeds a certain threshold.

正解:C


質問 # 128
......


IAPP CIPP-E認定は、欧州連合内のプライバシーとデータ保護の分野における個人の知識と専門知識を示す世界的に認められた資格情報です。この認定は、国際プライバシーの専門家協会によって開発および管理され、プライバシーとデータ保護の重要な原則と慣行をカバーしています。この試験は包括的であり、EUのデータ保護法と規制、プライバシーの枠組みと概念、データ処理と保持、インシデント管理と対応に関連するさまざまなトピックをカバーしています。

 

最新のCIPP-E試験問題集でIAPP試験問題にトレーニング:https://www.passtest.jp/IAPP/CIPP-E-shiken.html

更新された検証済みのCIPP-E問題集と解答で100%合格させる:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1NHpCMVDAyxLsBCCfAlRXry9PejYJsP77