
[2024年04月14日] 365日無料更新CTPRP知能問題集をゲット
ベスト品質のShared Assessments CTPRP試験問題
質問 # 27
Which statement is TRUE regarding defining vendor classification or risk tiering in a TPRM program?
- A. Vendor classification and risk tiers are based upon residual risk calculations
- B. Vendor classification and risk tier is determined by calculating the inherent risk associated with outsourcing a specific product or service
- C. Vendor classification and corresponding risk tiers utilize the same due diligence standards for controls evaluation based upon policy
- D. Vendor classification and risk tiering should only be used for critical third party relationships
正解:B
解説:
Vendor classification or risk tiering is a process of categorizing vendors based on the level of security risk they introduce to an organization12. It is a key component of a third-party risk management (TPRM) program, as it helps to prioritize and allocate resources for vendor assessment, monitoring, and remediation12. The statement D is true, as it reflects the first step of vendor classification or risk tiering, which is to determine the inherent risk of each vendor relationship based on the nature, scope, and complexity of the product or service being outsourced3 . Inherent risk is the risk that exists before any controls or mitigating factors are applied3 . By calculating the inherent risk, an organization can assign each vendor to a risk tier that reflects the potential impact and likelihood of a security breach or incident involving the vendor3 .
The other statements are false, as they do not accurately describe the vendor classification or risk tiering process. The statement A is false, as vendor classification and risk tiers are not based on residual risk calculations, but on inherent risk calculations. Residual risk is the risk that remains after controls or mitigating factors are applied3 . Residual risk is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the controls and the need for further action, but not to classify or tier vendors3 . The statement B is false, as vendor classification and risk tiering should be used for all third party relationships, not only for critical ones. Vendor classification and risk tiering helps to identify and prioritize the critical vendors, but also to manage the low and medium risk vendors according to their respective risk profiles12. The statement C is false, as vendor classification and corresponding risk tiers do not utilize the same due diligence standards for controls evaluation based upon policy, but different ones. Due diligence standards are the criteria and methods used to assess the security posture and performance of vendors. Due diligence standards should vary according to the risk tier of the vendor, as higher risk vendors require more rigorous and frequent evaluation than lower risk vendors.
References:
* 1: What is Vendor Tiering? Optimize Your Vendor Risk Management | UpGuard Blog
* 2: Vendor Tiering Best Practices: Categorizing Vendor Risks | UpGuard Blog
* 3: Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM): A Complete Guide - BlueVoyant
* [4]: Supplemental Examination Procedures for Risk Management of Third-Party Relationships
* [5]: Third Party Risk Management: Why It's Important And What Features To Look For - Expert Insights
質問 # 28
Which of the following is NOT a key component of TPRM requirements in the software development life cycle (SDLC)?
- A. Process for data destruction and disposal
- B. Maintenance of artifacts that provide proof that SOLC gates are executed
- C. Process for fixing security defects
- D. Software security testing
正解:A
解説:
In the context of Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) requirements within the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC), a process for data destruction and disposal is not typically considered a key component. The primary focus within SDLC in TPRM is on ensuring secure software development practices, which includes maintaining artifacts to prove that SDLC gates are executed, conducting software security testing, and having processes in place for fixing security defects. While data destruction and disposal are important security considerations, they are generally associated with data lifecycle management and information security management practices rather than being integral to the SDLC process itself.
References:
* Best practices in secure software development, as outlined in frameworks like the Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) by NIST, emphasize the importance of secure coding, vulnerability
* testing, and remediation processes rather than data disposal practices.
* The "Software Security Framework (SSF)" by the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) provides guidance on integrating security practices into the SDLC, focusing on areas like threat modeling, secure coding, and security testing.
質問 # 29
When conducting an assessment of a third party's physical security controls, which of the following represents the innermost layer in a 'Defense in Depth' model?
- A. Public external
- B. Public internal
- C. Private internal
- D. Restricted entry
正解:C
解説:
In the 'Defense in Depth' security model, the innermost layer typically focuses on protecting the most sensitive and critical assets, which are often categorized as 'Private internal'. This layer includes security controls and measures that are designed to safeguard the core, confidential aspects of an organization's infrastructure and data. It encompasses controls such as access controls, encryption, and monitoring of sensitive systems and data to prevent unauthorized access and ensure data integrity and confidentiality. The
'Private internal' layer is crucial for maintaining the security of critical information and systems that are essential to the organization's operations and could have the most significant impact if compromised.
Implementing robust security measures at this layer is vital for mitigating risks associated with physical access to critical infrastructure and sensitive information.
References:
* Security frameworks and standards, including NIST SP 800-53 (Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations) and the SANS Institute's guidelines on implementing
'Defense in Depth', provide detailed recommendations on securing the innermost layers of an organization's information systems.
* Publications such as "Physical Security Principles" by ASIS International offer insights into best practices for securing the private internal layer, including access control systems, surveillance, and intrusion detection mechanisms.
質問 # 30
Which factor is MOST important when scoping assessments of cloud-based third parties that access, process, and retain personal data?
- A. The identification of the type of cloud hosting deployment or service model in order to confirm responsibilities between the third party and the cloud hosting provider
- B. The geographic location of the vendor's outsourced datacenters since assessments are only required for international data transfers
- C. The definition of requirements for backup capabilities for power generation and redundancy in the resilience plan
- D. The contract terms for the configuration of the environment which may prevent conducting the assessment
正解:A
解説:
The most important factor when scoping assessments of cloud-based third parties that access, process, and retain personal data is to identify the type of cloud hosting deployment or service model. This is because different cloud models have different implications for the allocation of security responsibilities between the third party and the cloud hosting provider. For example, in a Software as a Service (SaaS) model, the cloud provider is responsible for most of the security controls, while in an Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) model, the third party is responsible for securing its own data and applications. Therefore, it is essential to understand the type of cloud model and the corresponding security roles and responsibilities before conducting an assessment. This will help to avoid gaps, overlaps, or conflicts in security controls and expectations.
References:
* Guidance on Cloud Security Assessment and Authorization - ITSP.50.105, Canadian Centre for Cyber Security, May 2020, Section 2.1.1
* The Importance of Properly Scoping Cloud Environments, PCI Security Standards Council and Cloud Security Alliance, August 2021
* Third party and cloud: Regulatory challenges, KPMG, 2022, Section 2.1
* Certified Third Party Risk Professional (CTPRP) Study Guide, Shared Assessments, 2021, Section 4.2.2
質問 # 31
Which of the following changes to the production environment is typically NOT subject to the change control process?
- A. Update to application
- B. Change in systems
- C. Change to administrator access
- D. Change in network
正解:C
解説:
Changes to administrator access are typically not subject to the traditional change control process, as they often pertain to user access management rather than modifications to the production environment's infrastructure or applications. Administrator access changes involve granting, altering, or revoking administrative privileges to systems, which is managed through access control policies and procedures rather than through change control. Change control processes are primarily concerned with changes to the network, systems, and applications that could affect the production environment's stability, security, and functionality.
In contrast, managing administrative access is part of identity and access management (IAM), which focuses on ensuring that only authorized individuals have access to specific levels of information and system functionality.
References:
* Access control and identity management best practices, such as those outlined in NIST SP 800-53 (Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations), emphasize the separation of duties and least privilege principles, which guide the management of administrator access changes.
* Resources like "Access Control Systems and Methodology" from ISC's CISSP Common Body of Knowledge provide guidelines on effectively managing access to prevent unauthorized access and maintain system security.
質問 # 32
At which level of reporting are changes in TPRM program metrics rare and exceptional?
- A. Business unit
- B. Executive management
- C. Risk committee
- D. Board of Directors
正解:D
解説:
TPRM program metrics are the indicators that measure the performance, effectiveness, and maturity of the TPRM program. They help to monitor and communicate the progress, achievements, and challenges of the TPRM program to various stakeholders, such as business units, executive management, risk committees, and board of directors. However, the level of reporting and the frequency of changes in TPRM program metrics vary depending on the stakeholder's role, responsibility, and interest123:
* Business unit: This level of reporting is focused on the operational aspects of the TPRM program, such as the status of vendor assessments, remediation actions, issues, and incidents. The changes in TPRM program metrics at this level are frequent and granular, as they reflect the day-to-day activities and outcomes of the TPRM program.
* Executive management: This level of reporting is focused on the strategic aspects of the TPRM program, such as the alignment with the business objectives, the compliance with the regulatory requirements, the management of the key risks, and the optimization of the resources and costs. The changes in TPRM program metrics at this level are less frequent and more aggregated, as they reflect the overall direction and performance of the TPRM program.
* Risk committee: This level of reporting is focused on the oversight aspects of the TPRM program, such as the evaluation of the risk appetite, the review of the risk profile, the approval of the risk policies, and the escalation of the risk issues. The changes in TPRM program metrics at this level are occasional and more analytical, as they reflect the governance and assurance of the TPRM program.
* Board of Directors: This level of reporting is focused on the advisory aspects of the TPRM program, such as the endorsement of the risk strategy, the awareness of the risk trends, the guidance of the risk culture, and the support of the risk initiatives. The changes in TPRM program metrics at this level are rare and exceptional, as they reflect the high-level and long-term vision and value of the TPRM program.
Therefore, the correct answer is D. Board of Directors, as this is the level of reporting where changes in TPRM program metrics are rare and exceptional. References:
* 1: 15 KPIs & Metrics to Measure the Success of Your TPRM Program | UpGuard
* 2: Third-party risk management metrics: Best practices to enhance your ... | Diligent
* 3: TPRM Metrics - Telling Your Risk Story - Shared Assessments | Shared Assessments
質問 # 33
Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding the accountabilities in a three lines of defense model?
- A. The third line of defense is an assurance function that has independence from the business unit
- B. The second line of defense is management within the business unit
- C. The first line of defense is the risk or compliance team that provides an oversight or governance function
- D. The third line of defense must be limited to an external assessment firm
正解:A
解説:
The three lines of defense model is a way of explaining the relationship between functions and roles of risk management and control in an organization. It involves the first line of defense (owning and managing risks), the second line of defense (overseeing or specialising in risk), and the third line of defense (providing independent assurance)1. The third line of defense is typically the internal audit function, which provides objective and independent assurance to the governing body, management, regulators, and external auditors that the control culture across the organization is effective in its design and operation2. The third line of defense must have independence from the business unit, meaning that it is not involved in the execution of business activities or the design and implementation of controls, and that it reports to the highest level of governance, such as the board or the audit committee3. The third line of defense is not limited to an external assessment firm, although external assurance providers may complement or supplement the work of the internal audit function2. References:
* 1: Internal audit: three lines of defence model explained | ICAS
* 2: Modernizing The Three Lines of Defense Model | Deloitte US
* 3: THE IIA S THREE LINES MODEL
質問 # 34
Upon completion of a third party assessment, a meeting should be scheduled with which of the following resources prior to sharing findings with the vendor/service provider to approve remediation plans:
- A. CISO/CIO
- B. C&O
- C. Business Unit Relationship Owner
- D. internal Audit
正解:C
解説:
According to the Shared Assessments CTPRP Study Guide, the business unit relationship owner is the primary point of contact for the third party and is responsible for ensuring that the third party meets the contractual obligations and service level agreements. The business unit relationship owner is also involved in the third party risk assessment process and the remediation plan approval. Therefore, a meeting should be scheduled with the business unit relationship owner before sharing the findings and remediation plans with the third party, as they have the authority and accountability to approve or reject the plans. The other options are not necessarily involved in the remediation plan approval, although they may have other roles in the third party risk management lifecycle. References:
* Shared Assessments CTPRP Study Guide, page 9, section 1.3.2
* The Third-Party Vendor Risk Management Lifecycle, section on Supplier Onboarding & Risk Monitoring
* Remediation vs. Mitigation, section on Remediation
質問 # 35
Which cloud deployment model is primarily used for load balancing?
- A. Community Cloud
- B. Hybrid Cloud
- C. Private Cloud
- D. Public Cloud
正解:B
解説:
Hybrid cloud is the cloud deployment model that is primarily used for load balancing. Load balancing is the process of distributing workloads and network traffic across multiple servers or resources to optimize performance, reliability, and scalability1. Load balancing can help prevent overloading or underutilizing any single server or resource, as well as improve fault tolerance and availability. Hybrid cloud is a mix of two or more different deployment models, such as public cloud, private cloud, or community cloud2. Hybrid cloud allows organizations to leverage the benefits of both public and private clouds, such as cost efficiency, scalability, security, and control3. Hybrid cloud can also enable load balancing across different cloud environments, depending on the demand, cost, and performance requirements of each workload. For example, an organization can use a private cloud for sensitive or mission-critical applications that require high security and performance, and a public cloud for less sensitive or variable applications that require more scalability and flexibility. By using a hybrid cloud, the organization can balance the load between the private and public clouds, and optimize the resource utilization and cost efficiency of each cloud.
The other cloud deployment models are not primarily used for load balancing, although they may have some load balancing capabilities within their own environments. Public cloud is the infrastructure that is shared by multiple tenants and open to the public. Anyone can use the public cloud by subscribing to it. Public cloud offers high scalability, elasticity, and cost-effectiveness, but may have lower security, privacy, and control than private cloud2. Community cloud is the infrastructure that is shared by similar consumers who collaborate to set up a cloud for their exclusive use. For example, government organizations can form a cloud for their exclusive use. Community cloud offers some benefits of both public and private clouds, such as shared costs, common standards, and enhanced security, but may have lower scalability and flexibility than public cloud2. Private cloud is the infrastructure that is for the exclusive use of a single organization. The cloud may or may not be operated by the organization. Private cloud offers high security, privacy, and control, but may have lower scalability, elasticity, and cost-effectiveness than public cloud2. References:
* 1: What is Load Balancing? | How Load Balancing Works | F5
* 2: The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing
* 3: What is Hybrid Cloud? | IBM
* : Hybrid Cloud Load Balancing - Kemp Technologies
* : [Hybrid Cloud Load Balancing: What You Need to Know - CloudHealth by VMware]
質問 # 36
You are updating program requirements due to shift in use of technologies by vendors to enable hybrid work.
Which statement is LEAST likely to represent components of an Asset
Management Program?
- A. Asset inventories should track the flow or distribution of items used to fulfill products and Services across production lines
- B. Asset inventories should include connections to external parties, networks, or systems that process data
- C. Assets should be classified based on criticality or data sensitivity
- D. Each asset should include an organizational owner who is responsible for the asset throughout its life cycle
正解:A
解説:
Asset management is the process of identifying, tracking, and managing the physical and digital assets of an organization. An asset management program is a set of policies, procedures, and tools that help to ensure the optimal use, security, and disposal of assets. According to the Shared Assessments CTPRP Study Guide1, an asset management program should include the following components:
* Asset inventories: A comprehensive and accurate list of all assets owned, leased, or used by the organization, including hardware, software, data, and services. Asset inventories should include connections to external parties, networks, or systems that process data, as this may introduce additional risks and dependencies12.
* Asset owners: A clear assignment of roles and responsibilities for each asset, including an organizational owner who is accountable for the asset throughout its life cycle. Asset owners should ensure that assets are properly maintained, updated, secured, and disposed of in accordance with the organization's policies and standards13.
* Asset classification: A consistent and objective method of categorizing assets based on their criticality or data sensitivity. Asset classification helps to determine the appropriate level of protection, monitoring, and testing for each asset, as well as the potential impact of asset loss or compromise1 .
* Asset controls: A set of measures and mechanisms that help to safeguard assets from unauthorized access, use, modification, disclosure, or destruction. Asset controls may include physical, technical, administrative, or contractual means, such as locks, encryption, passwords, policies, or agreements1 .
The statement that is least likely to represent a component of an asset management program is D. Asset inventories should track the flow or distribution of items used to fulfill products and Services across production lines. This statement describes a supply chain management function, not an asset management function. Supply chain management is the process of planning, coordinating, and controlling the flow of materials, information, and services from suppliers to customers. Supply chain management may involve some aspects of asset management, such as inventory control, quality assurance, or vendor risk management, but it is not the same as asset management . Asset management focuses on the assets that the organization owns or uses, not the assets that the organization produces or delivers.
References:
* 1: Shared Assessments. (2020). Certified Third Party Risk Professional (CTPRP) Study Guide.
* 2: ISACA. (2019). COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. APO03 Manage enterprise architecture.
* 3: ISO. (2018). ISO/IEC 27001:2018 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements. Clause 8.1.2 Asset management roles and responsibilities.
* : NIST. (2013). NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. RA-2 Security Categorization.
* : NIST. (2013). NIST Special Publication 800-53 Revision 4 Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Information Systems and Organizations. CM-8 Information System Component Inventory.
* : APICS. (2018). APICS Dictionary, 16th edition. Supply chain management.
* : ISACA. (2019). COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives. APO13 Manage security.
質問 # 37
Which of the following data safeguarding techniques provides the STRONGEST assurance that data does not identify an individual?
- A. Data masking
- B. Data anonymization
- C. Data encryption
- D. Data compression
正解:B
解説:
Data anonymization is the process of removing or altering any information that can be used to identify an individual from a data set. This technique provides the strongest assurance that data does not identify an individual, as it makes it impossible or extremely difficult to link the data back to the original source. Data anonymization can be achieved by various methods, such as generalization, suppression, perturbation, or pseudonymization12. Data anonymization is often used for privacy protection, compliance with data protection regulations, and data sharing purposes3. References:
* 1: Data Security: Definition, Importance, and Types | Fortinet
* 2: Data Security Best Practices: Top 10 Data Protection Methods - Ekran System
* 3: Data anonymization - Wikipedia
質問 # 38
You receive a call from a vendor that two laptops and a tablet are missing that were used to process your company data. The asset loss occurred two years ago, but was only recently discovered. That statement may indicate that this vendor is lacking an adequate:
- A. Data Loss Prevention Program
- B. Information Security Incident Notification Policy
- C. Asset Management Program
- D. Physical and Environmental Security Program
正解:C
解説:
The scenario described indicates a lack in the vendor's Asset Management Program. An effective Asset Management Program includes maintaining an accurate inventory of hardware and devices, monitoring their status, and promptly identifying and responding to any losses or discrepancies. The failure to discover the loss of laptops and a tablet that processed company data for two years suggests deficiencies in tracking and managing physical assets. This lapse can lead to risks associated with data security, regulatory compliance, and operational integrity. A robust Asset Management Program should ensure that all assets are accounted for, their usage is monitored, and any anomalies or losses are quickly identified and addressed.
References:
* IT asset management standards, such as ISO/IEC 27001 (Information Security Management), emphasize the importance of maintaining an inventory of assets and implementing appropriate controls to safeguard
* organizational assets.
* The "IT Asset Management Handbook" by the International Association of IT Asset Managers (IAITAM) provides guidelines on establishing a comprehensive Asset Management Program, including best practices for asset tracking, monitoring, and loss prevention.
質問 # 39
Which type of contract provision is MOST important in managing Fourth-Nth party risk after contract signing and on-boarding due diligence is complete?
- A. Indemnification and liability
- B. Right to audit
- C. Subcontractor notice and approval
- D. Breach notification
正解:C
解説:
Fourth-Nth party risk refers to the potential threats and vulnerabilities associated with the subcontractors, vendors, or service providers of an organization's direct third-party partners12. After contract signing and on-boarding due diligence is complete, the most important type of contract provision to manage Fourth-Nth party risk is subcontractor notice and approval. This provision requires the third party to inform the organization of any subcontracting arrangements and obtain the organization's consent before engaging any Fourth-Nth parties345. This provision enables the organization to have visibility and control over the extended network of suppliers and service providers, and to assess the potential risks and impacts of any outsourcing decisions. Subcontractor notice and approval also helps the organization to ensure that the Fourth-Nth parties comply with the same standards and expectations as the third party, and to hold the third party accountable for the performance and security of the Fourth-Nth parties345. References:
* 1: Understanding 4th- and Nth-Party Risk: What Do You Need to Know? | Mitratech
* 2: Understanding 4th- and Nth-Party Risk: What Do You Need to Know? | Mitratech Holdings, Inc - JDSupra
* 3: First, 2nd , 3rd , 4th, 5th Parties: How to Measure the Tiers of Risk
* 4: Managing 4th Party Risk with Vendor Insurance Verification - Evident ID
* 5: How to Write Fourth-Party Vendor Requirements Into the Contract - Venminder
質問 # 40
Which statement BEST reflects the factors that help you determine the frequency of cyclical assessments?
- A. Vendor assessment frequency may need to be changed if the vendor has disclosed a data breach
- B. Vendor assessment frequency should be based on the level of risk and criticality of the vendor to your operations as determined by their vendor risk score
- C. Vendor assessments should be scheduled based on the type of services/products provided
- D. Vendor assessments should be conducted during onboarding and then be replaced by continuous monitoring
正解:B
解説:
The frequency of cyclical assessments is one of the key factors that determines the effectiveness and efficiency of a TPRM program. Cyclical assessments are periodic reviews of the vendor's performance, compliance, and risk posture that are conducted after the initial onboarding assessment. The frequency of cyclical assessments should be aligned with the organization's risk appetite and tolerance, and should reflect the level of risk and criticality of the vendor to the organization's operations. A common approach to determine the frequency of cyclical assessments is to use a vendor risk score, which is a numerical value that represents the vendor's inherent and residual risk based on various criteria, such as the type, scope, and complexity of the services or products provided, the vendor's security and privacy controls, the vendor's compliance with relevant regulations and standards, the vendor's past performance and incident history, and the vendor's business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities. The vendor risk score can be used to categorize the vendors into different risk tiers, such as high, medium, and low, and assign appropriate frequencies for cyclical assessments, such as annually, biannually, or quarterly. For example, a high-risk vendor may require an annual assessment, while a low-risk vendor may require a biannual or quarterly assessment. The vendor risk score and the frequency of cyclical assessments should be reviewed and updated regularly to account for any changes in the vendor's risk profile or the organization's risk appetite.
The other three statements do not best reflect the factors that help you determine the frequency of cyclical assessments, as they are either too rigid, too vague, or too reactive. Statement A implies that vendor assessments are only necessary during onboarding and can be replaced by continuous monitoring afterwards.
However, continuous monitoring alone is not sufficient to ensure the vendor's compliance and risk management, as it may not capture all the aspects of the vendor's performance and risk posture, such as contractual obligations, service level agreements, audit results, and remediation actions. Therefore, vendor assessments should be conducted during onboarding and at regular intervals thereafter, complemented by continuous monitoring. Statement C suggests that vendor assessments should be scheduled based on the type of services or products provided, without considering the other factors that may affect the vendor's risk level and criticality, such as the vendor's security and privacy controls, the vendor's compliance with relevant regulations and standards, the vendor's past performance and incident history, and the vendor's business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities. Therefore, statement C is too vague and does not provide a clear and consistent basis for determining the frequency of cyclical assessments. Statement D indicates that vendor assessment frequency may need to be changed if the vendor has disclosed a data breach, implying that the frequency of cyclical assessments is only adjusted in response to a negative event. However, this approach is too reactive and may not prevent or mitigate the impact of the data breach, as the vendor's risk level and criticality may have already increased before the data breach occurred. Therefore, statement D does not reflect a proactive and risk-based approach to determining the frequency of cyclical assessments. References:
* Third-Party Risk Management 101: Guiding Principles
* Mastering the TPRM Lifecycle
* Third Party Risk Management Maturity Assessment
質問 # 41
Which of the following actions is an early step when triggering an Information Security Incident Response Program?
- A. Initiating an investigation of the unauthorized disclosure of data
- B. Implementing processes for emergency change control approvals
- C. Requiring periodic changes to the vendor's contract for breach notification
- D. Assessing the vendor's Business Impact Analysis (BIA) for resuming operations
正解:A
解説:
According to the NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, one of the first steps in responding to an incident is to identify the scope, nature, and source of the incident. This involves gathering evidence, analyzing logs, interviewing witnesses, and performing forensic analysis. The goal is to determine the extent of the compromise, the type of attack, the identity or location of the attacker, and the potential impact on the organization and its stakeholders. This step is essential for containing the incident, mitigating the damage, and preventing further escalation or recurrence. References:
* NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide1, Section 3.2.2 Identification
* Cisco What Is an Incident Response Plan for IT?2, Section 2. Respond
* CrowdStrike Incident Response [Beginner's Guide]3, Section 3. Incident Response Steps
質問 # 42
What attribute is MOST likely to be included in the software development lifecycle (SDLC) process?
- A. Conducting peer code reviews
- B. Scanning for data input validation in production
- C. Defining the scope of annual penetration tests
- D. Scheduling the frequency of automated vulnerability scans
正解:A
解説:
Peer code reviews are an essential part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC) process, as they help to improve the quality, security, and maintainability of the code. Peer code reviews involve having other developers review the code written by a developer before it is merged into the main branch or deployed to production. Peer code reviews can help to identify and fix errors, bugs, vulnerabilities, performance issues, coding standards violations, design flaws, and other issues that may affect the functionality or usability of the software. Peer code reviews also facilitate knowledge sharing, collaboration, and feedback among the development team, which can enhance the skills and productivity of the developers123.
The other options are not as likely to be included in the SDLC process, as they are either performed at different stages or not directly related to the development of the software. Scheduling the frequency of automated vulnerability scans and defining the scope of annual penetration tests are more related to the security testing and monitoring of the software, which are usually done after the development phase or as part of the maintenance phase. Scanning for data input validation in production is also a security measure that is done after the software is deployed, and it is not a good practice to rely on production testing alone, as it may expose the software to potential attacks or data breaches. Data input validation should be done during the development and testing phases, as well as in production123. References:
* What is SDLC? - Software Development Lifecycle Explained - AWS
* Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) - GeeksforGeeks
* What Is the Software Development Life Cycle? SDLC Explained | Coursera
質問 # 43
Which action statement BEST describes an assessor calculating residual risk?
- A. The assessor adjusts the vendor risk rating based on changes to the risk level after analyzing the findings and mitigating controls
- B. The assessor recommends implementing continuous monitoring for the next 18 months
- C. The assessor adjusts the vendor risk rating prior to reporting the findings to the business unit
- D. The business unit closes out the finding prior to the assessor submitting the final report
正解:A
解説:
When calculating residual risk, the best practice for an assessor is to adjust the vendor risk rating based on the changes to the risk level after analyzing the findings and considering the effectiveness of mitigating controls.
Residual risk refers to the level of risk that remains after controls are applied to mitigate the initial (inherent) risk. By evaluating the findings from a third-party assessment and factoring in the mitigating controls implemented by the vendor, the assessor can more accurately determine the remaining risk level. This adjusted risk rating provides a more realistic view of the vendor's risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making regarding risk management and vendor oversight.
References:
* The concept of residual risk calculation is discussed in risk management frameworks such as ISO 31000 (Risk Management - Guidelines), which guides the assessment and treatment of risks.
* The "Third-Party Risk Management Guide" by ISACA outlines the process of assessing and managing risks associated with third parties, including the calculation of residual risk.
質問 # 44
When updating TPRM vendor classification requirements with a focus on availability, which risk rating factors provide the greatest impact to the analysis?
- A. Type of data by classification; volume of records included in data processing
- B. Network connectivity; remote access to applications
- C. impact on operations and end users; impact on revenue; impact on regulatory compliance
- D. Financial viability of the vendor; ability to meet performance metrics
正解:C
解説:
TPRM vendor classification is the process of categorizing vendors based on their criticality, risk level, and service type. Vendor classification helps to prioritize and allocate resources for vendor assessment, monitoring, and remediation. Vendor classification should be updated periodically to reflect changes in the business environment, vendor performance, and regulatory requirements.
When updating TPRM vendor classification requirements with a focus on availability, the risk rating factors that provide the greatest impact to the analysis are the impact on operations and end users, the impact on revenue, and the impact on regulatory compliance. This is because:
* Availability is the degree to which a system or service is accessible and functional when required by authorized users. Availability is a key component of information security and business continuity, as it ensures that the business can operate normally and deliver value to its customers and stakeholders.
* Impact on operations and end users measures the extent to which a vendor's service disruption or failure affects the business processes, functions, and activities that depend on the vendor's service. A high impact on operations and end users means that the vendor's service is essential for the business to perform its core functions and meet its objectives, and that any downtime or degradation of the service would cause significant operational delays, inefficiencies, or losses.
* Impact on revenue measures the extent to which a vendor's service disruption or failure affects the business's income, profitability, and market share. A high impact on revenue means that the vendor's service is directly or indirectly linked to the business's revenue generation, and that any downtime or degradation of the service would cause substantial financial losses, reduced customer satisfaction, or competitive disadvantage.
* Impact on regulatory compliance measures the extent to which a vendor's service disruption or failure affects the business's adherence to the laws, regulations, standards, and contractual obligations that govern its industry, sector, or jurisdiction. A high impact on regulatory compliance means that the vendor's service is subject to strict regulatory requirements, and that any downtime or degradation of the service would cause serious legal penalties, fines, sanctions, or reputational damage.
Therefore, these three factors are the most important to consider when updating TPRM vendor classification requirements with a focus on availability, as they reflect the potential consequences and risks of vendor unavailability for the business.
References:
* CTPRP Job Guide
* Criticality and Risk Rating Vendors 101
* The Third-Party Vendor Risk Management Lifecycle
* What Is Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM)? 2024 Guide
* Third-Party Risk Management and ISO Requirements for 2022
質問 # 45
Which of the following BEST reflects the risk of a 'shadow IT" function?
- A. "Shadow IT" functions often fail to detect unauthorized use of information assets
- B. "Shadow IT" functions often lack governance and security oversight
- C. Failure to implement strong security controls because IT is executed remotely
- D. inability to prevent "shadow IT' functions from using unauthorized software solutions
正解:B
解説:
Shadow IT refers to the use of IT systems, services, or devices that are not authorized, approved, or supported by the official IT department. Shadow IT can pose significant risks to an organization's data security, compliance, performance, and reputation. One of the main risks of shadow IT is that it often lacks governance and security oversight. This means that the shadow IT functions may not follow the established policies, standards, and best practices for IT management, such as data protection, access control, encryption, backup, patching, auditing, and reporting. This can expose the organization to various threats, such as data breaches, cyberattacks, malware infections, legal liabilities, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. Additionally, shadow IT can create operational inefficiencies, compatibility issues, duplication of efforts, and increased costs for the organization.
According to the web search results from the search_web tool, shadow IT is a common and growing phenomenon in many organizations, especially with the proliferation of cloud-based services and applications. Some of the articles suggest the following best practices for managing and mitigating shadow IT risks123:
* Performing SaaS assessments to proactively detect shadow IT
* Prioritizing user experience (UX) and providing support for integrating tools
* Streamlining user account and identity management
* Using operating systems and devices with which employees are comfortable
* Compromising and collaborating with users to minimize shadow IT risks
* Educating and training users on the security risks and consequences of shadow IT
* Establishing clear policies and guidelines for IT procurement and usage
* Creating a culture of trust and transparency between IT and business units Therefore, the verified answer to the question is B. "Shadow IT" functions often lack governance and security oversight.
References:
* Shadow IT Explained: Risks & Opportunities - BMC Software
* Start reducing your organization's Shadow IT risk in 3 steps
* What is shadow IT? - Article | SailPoint
質問 # 46
Which of the following actions reflects the first step in developing an emergency response plan?
- A. Conduct an assessment that includes an inventory of the types of events that have the greatest potential to trigger an emergency response plan
- B. incorporate periodic crisis management team tabletop exercises to test different scenarios
- C. Consider work-from-home parameters in the emergency response plan
- D. Use the results of continuous monitoring tools to develop the emergency response plan
正解:A
解説:
An emergency response plan (ERP) is a document that outlines the procedures and actions to be taken by an organization in the event of a disruptive incident that threatens its operations, assets, reputation, or stakeholders1. An ERP should be aligned with the organization's business continuity and disaster recovery plans, and should cover the roles and responsibilities, communication channels, escalation processes, resources, and recovery strategies for different types of emergencies2.
The first step in developing an ERP is to conduct an assessment that includes an inventory of the types of events that have the greatest potential to trigger an ERP3. This assessment should consider the likelihood and impact of various scenarios, such as natural disasters, cyberattacks, pandemics, civil unrest, terrorism, or supply chain disruptions, and identify the critical functions, processes, assets, and dependencies that could be affected by these events4. The assessment should also evaluate the existing capabilities and gaps in the organization's preparedness and response, and prioritize the areas that need improvement or enhancement5.
The assessment should be based on a comprehensive risk analysis and a business impact analysis, and should involve input from relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, business units, IT, security, legal, compliance, human resources, and third parties.
The other options are not the first step in developing an ERP, but rather subsequent or complementary steps that should be performed after the initial assessment. Considering work-from-home parameters, incorporating periodic crisis management team tabletop exercises, and using the results of continuous monitoring tools are all important aspects of an ERP, but they are not the starting point for creating one. These steps should be based on the findings and recommendations of the assessment, and should be updated and tested regularly to ensure the effectiveness and relevance of the ERP. References: 1: What is an Emergency Response Plan? | IBM 2: Emergency Response Plan | Ready.gov 3: 8 Steps to Building a Third-Party Incident Response Plan | Prevalent 4: How to create an effective business continuity plan | CIO 5: Emergency Response Planning: 4 Steps to Creating a Plan : Third-Party Risk Management: Final Interagency Guidance : Improving Third-Party Incident Response | Prevalent
質問 # 47
The following statements reflect user obligations defined in end-user device policies EXCEPT:
- A. A statement that defines the process to remove all organizational data, settings and accounts alt offboarding
- B. A statement detailing user responsibility in ensuring the security of the end-user device
- C. A statement that specifies the ability to synchronize mobile device data with enterprise systems
- D. A statement specifying the owner of data on the end-user device
正解:C
解説:
End-user device policies are policies that establish the rules and requirements for the use and management of devices that access organizational data, networks, and systems. These policies typically include user obligations that define the responsibilities and expectations of the users regarding the security, privacy, and compliance of the devices they use. According to the web search results from the search_web tool, some common user obligations defined in end-user device policies are:
* A statement specifying the owner of data on the end-user device: This statement clarifies who owns the data stored on the device, whether it is the organization, the user, or a third party. This statement also defines the rights and obligations of the data owner and the data custodian, such as the access, retention, disposal, and protection of the data123.
* A statement that defines the process to remove all organizational data, settings and accounts at offboarding: This statement outlines the steps and procedures that the user must follow to securely erase or transfer all organizational data, settings, and accounts from the device when they leave the
* organization or change their role. This statement also specifies the roles and responsibilities of the user, the organization, and the device manager in ensuring the proper offboarding of the device143.
* A statement detailing user responsibility in ensuring the security of the end-user device: This statement describes the actions and measures that the user must take to protect the device from unauthorized access, theft, loss, damage, or compromise. This statement may include requirements such as enabling encryption, password, firewall, antivirus, updates, and backups, as well as reporting any incidents or issues related to the device1435.
However, option D, a statement that specifies the ability to synchronize mobile device data with enterprise systems, is not a user obligation defined in end-user device policies. Rather, this statement is a feature or functionality that may be enabled or disabled by the organization or the device manager, depending on the security and compliance needs of the organization. This statement may also be part of a device configuration policy or a mobile device management policy, which are different from end-user device policies. Therefore, option D is the correct answer, as it is the only one that does not reflect a user obligation defined in end-user device policies. References: The following resources support the verified answer and explanation:
* 1: End-User Device Policy | IT Services - University of Chicago
* 4: Device compliance policies in Microsoft Intune | Microsoft Learn
* 2: Basics of an End User Computing Policy - Apparity Blog
* 3: End-User Device Management Standard Operating Procedure
* 5: End-User Devices | Information Security - University of Chicago
質問 # 48
Which statement is TRUE regarding a vendor's approach to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) programs?
- A. ESG requirements and programs may be directed by regulatory obligations or in response to company commitments
- B. ESG obligations only apply to a company with publicly traded stocks
- C. ESG expectations are driven by a company's executive team for internal commitments end not external entities
- D. ESG commitments can only be measured qualitatively so it cannot be included in vendor due diligence standards
正解:A
解説:
ESG programs are initiatives that aim to improve the environmental, social, and governance performance of a vendor or service provider. ESG programs may be driven by various factors, such as regulatory obligations, customer expectations, stakeholder pressure, industry standards, or company commitments. Therefore, statement B is true and the correct answer is B. Statement A is false because ESG expectations may come from external entities, such as regulators, investors, customers, or civil society. Statement C is false because ESG commitments can be measured both qualitatively and quantitatively, using indicators such as carbon emissions, diversity, ethics, or compliance. Statement D is false because ESG obligations may apply to any company, regardless of its size, ownership, or sector. References:
* Third-party risk management and the ESG agenda
* ESG third-party risk
* The Role of Third-Party Risk Management in ESG Compliance
質問 # 49
Which type of external event does NOT trigger an organization ta prompt a third party contract provisions review?
- A. Business continuity event
- B. Change in regulations
- C. Data breach/privacy incident
- D. Change in company point of contact
正解:D
解説:
A change in company point of contact does not necessarily trigger an organization to prompt a third party contract provisions review, unless the contract specifically requires such a notification or approval. A change in company point of contact may affect the communication and relationship between the parties, but it does not affect the legal terms and obligations of the contract. However, other types of external events, such as business continuity events, data breaches/privacy incidents, and changes in regulations, may have a significant impact on the performance, compliance, and risk of the contract, and therefore may require a review of the contract provisions to ensure that they are still valid, enforceable, and aligned with the parties' expectations and objectives. For example, a business continuity event may disrupt the delivery of goods or services, a data breach/privacy incident may expose confidential or personal information, and a change in regulations may impose new obligations or liabilities on the parties. These events may trigger clauses such as force majeure, termination, indemnification, or dispute resolution, and may require the parties to renegotiate or amend the contract accordingly. References:
* Third-Party Contract Reviews: Determining Your Best Options
* Third party contracts: best practices for third party paper
* What to Look For When Reviewing Third-Party Contracts
* CTPRP Job Guide
質問 # 50
Which factor in patch management is MOST important when conducting postcybersecurity incident analysis related to systems and applications?
- A. Configuration
- B. Approvals
- C. Log retention
- D. Testing
正解:D
解説:
In patch management, testing is the most crucial factor when conducting post-cybersecurity incident analysis related to systems and applications. Proper testing of patches before deployment ensures that they effectively address vulnerabilities without introducing new issues or incompatibilities that could impact system functionality or security. Testing allows organizations to verify that the patch resolves the identified security issue without adversely affecting the system or application's performance. It also helps in identifying potential conflicts with existing configurations or dependencies. Effective testing strategies include regression testing, performance testing, and security testing to ensure comprehensive validation of the patch's effectiveness and safety before widespread deployment. This approach aligns with best practices in patch management, emphasizing the importance of thorough testing to mitigate the risk of unintended consequences and ensure the continued security and stability of systems and applications.
References:
* Industry standards such as ISO/IEC 27001 (Information Security Management) highlight the importance of a systematic approach to managing patches, including the role of testing in assessing the effectiveness and impact of patches.
* Resources like "Patch Management Best Practices" from the Center for Internet Security (CIS) provide guidance on developing and implementing a patch management program that includes rigorous testing procedures to ensure patches are safely and effectively applied.
質問 # 51
......
Shared Assessments試験練習テスト問題で高得点を目指そう:https://www.passtest.jp/Shared-Assessments/CTPRP-shiken.html
検証された材料は決まってこれ!CTPRP:https://drive.google.com/open?id=1lF9lON-PSImuSSCEz8ckR3YBLOpU20Tm